SS and VT discussed the concepts for inclusion. SS drafted the infographic, which was critically reviewed by VT. Both authors approved the final version of the infographic.
Funding
None declared.
Availability of data and materials
None declared.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
None declared.
Competing interests
None declared.
References
1.
WuchtyS,
JonesBF,
UzziB. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 2007;316(5827):1036–1039.
2.
BattistaA,
KonopaskyAW,
YoonMH. Programs of research in healthcare simulation. In: NestelD,
HuiJ,
KunklerK,
ScerboM,
CalhounA, editors. Healthcare simulation research. Cham: Springer. 2019. p. 15–20.
3.
BearmanM,
ChengA,
NadkarniVM,
NestelD. Unpacking the social dimensions of research: how to get started in healthcare simulation research. In: NestelD,
HuiJ,
KunklerK,
ScerboM,
CalhounA, editors. Healthcare simulation research. Cham: Springer. 2019. p. 333–340
4.
ChengA,
KesslerD,
MackinnonR, et al.
Conducting multicenter research in healthcare simulation: lessons learned from the INSPIRE network. Advances in Simulation. 2017;2:6.
5.
BelbinM. Management teams: why they succeed or fail. Human Resource Management International Digest. 2011;19(3):25–38.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated).
How to build a simulation-based research team
Twitter
Facebook
WhatsApp
LinkedIn
Tweets