Home Volume: 2, Issue: 2
International Journal of Healthcare Simulation
Adi Health + Wellness
Advancing the frontiers of innovation: insights and perspectives
DOI:10.54531/mhne1018, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 55-57
Article Type: Editorial, Article History

Table of Contents



Open Sesame

And the door to 2023 opened with another edition of Short Reports on Simulation Innovations Supplement (SRSIS), bringing us novel ideas and creative solutions! For the first supplement of 2023, we received and reviewed articles about how simulationists conquered their unique challenges with a small dose of out-of-the-box thinking and a hefty dose of passion for simulation-based healthcare education (SBHE) in their professional fields. Being innovative is also one of the crucial traits of a simulationist.

Innovation comes in different forms and sizes and is the process by which new ideas are exploited to create economic, social and environmental value [1]. In this edition of SRSIS, the authors have leveraged both the technology and the technique from virtual reality (VR) [24] to do-it-yourself (DIY) models [5,6] and wearable physiologic monitors using smart textiles [7] to train simulation participants [8]. A quick overview of the submissions in this supplement and the trends they support are included below.

Most submissions used VR, reflecting a rapid upward trend from less than 12 billion U.S. dollars in 2022 to a projected value of 22 billion U.S. dollars by 2025 in the VR market [9]. VR is used for SBHE training as apps, treating patients as digital therapeutics [10,11], or as a patient education tool [12]. The multitude of eXtended reality (XR), which comprises VR, mixed reality (MR) and augmented reality (AR), led to different healthcare institutes integrating its training into their curricula [13]. Researching the nuances of XR application for healthcare providers provides the next step in this direction.

Additionally, the authors used the DIY models approach to tackle their teaching/learning environment challenges. The DIY innovative simulation solutions bring several benefits, such as return on investment and value [5,6,14], overcoming simulator limitations [15] and systems deficiencies [16], among several others. The smart textiles concept goes far back to its use by the armed forces for medical trauma assessment [17]. Several simulation industry vendors are developing similar products. However, research on this technology and its use in healthcare simulation are not prevalent, making it a novel situation in MacQuarrie et al.’s setting [7].

Lastly, SP methodology was the most used simulation training approach reported in a survey at the onset of the pandemic [18]. Being a true researcher, Holligan et al. [8] explained the shortcomings of SP methodology and their mitigating efforts in subsequent training. Their article emphasizes that sometimes innovation is born out of necessity when deficiencies are accepted and remedied [8].

Current trends

Artificial intelligence

The increasing role of artificial intelligence (AI) and its associated field, machine learning (ML), makes it a perfect research candidate for new technological frontiers [19] beyond ChatGpT [20]. AI in healthcare is predicted to increase from $1.4 billion in 2018 to $17.8 billion by 2025 [19].

XR applications

The distance between the learners and educators has decreased with using XR applications[13]. Combining the XR application with multiple data-gathering sources [13] (such as hand and gaze tracking, audio feed, and vital signs) with the newest Edge AI technology opened up new investigation areas for researchers [21].

Bridging the gap

Bridging the gap between the global north and south in innovation and research is essential [22]. With more awareness about diversity, equity and inclusivity, more researchers are working with their counterparts in different areas of the world. The very existence of this journal is the hallmark of this effort.


In the previous SRSIS editorial [23], authors suggested some areas for SBHE researchers, such as human factors in simulation, research into XR applications, and diversity, equity and inclusivity. Besides reemphasizing these areas, we recommend research on the following concepts.

Professional development

The significance of professional development is evident [24,25]; more innovative research is needed that is grounded in a theoretical framework and utilizes the most current technological applications.

Multi-site translational simulation-based research

Translational simulation is a functional descriptor of healthcare simulation whose purpose is to directly demonstrate improvement in patient care and healthcare systems, minimizing other variables’ effects on the desired outcomes [26]. A significant gap in the simulation literature is deploying methodologically sound translational research at multiple sites. Conducting multi-site research provides larger, more generalizable results necessary to move the field forward [27].

Disaster preparedness

The frequency of mass casualty events is increasing, from man-made atrocities such as wars, suicide bombings and mass shootings to natural catastrophes, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes and pandemics such as COVID-19. These events add to the already present and growing healthcare training needs to prepare teams for various disasters to save as many lives as possible.

No time is better than the current time to find new and efficient ways grounded in research. Each edition of SRSIS is a Sesame that brings innovative treasures of simulation research for our broader simulation community. Therefore, we invite all researchers to create new ways to address these highlighted issues and publish their findings from successful and not-so-successful research.


Authors’ contributions

MB, AM and RAA participated in this paper’s conceptualization, planning and design. All authors contributed to the writing and have followed the instructions for authors, and read and approved the manuscript.


There were no sources of funding for this study.

Availability of data and materials

None declared.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

None declared.

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.



Steenstra D, Erkoyuncu JA . Using visualisation for disruptive innovation in healthcare. Virtual, Augmented Reality and Serious Games for Healthcare. 2014;1:111142.


Keitley JA, Kennedy T, Altemimi B . Gamification of non-technical skills teaching for doctors returning to training. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2023.


Neumann C, Tomy T, Vognsen J, Major S . Immersive and screen based virtual reality simulations enhance empathy. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2023.


Williams B, Beovich B, Olaussen A, Hunter J . Does immersive simulation influence paramedicine students’ situational awareness? International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2023.


Roche AF, Eppich W, O’Keeffe D, O’Riordan J, Condron C . Developing a simulation training model for abdominal wall opening and closure. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2023.


Clarke S, Gilchrist A . Development of a standalone and low-cost simulation switchboard. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2023.


MacQuarrie A, Stainer M, Deetlefs C, Sidhu J . Wearable physiologic monitoring in healthcare simulation. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2023.


Holligan C, Higgs J, Robertson E, Cavanagh B . Our journey to developing simulated patients for a psychiatric setting. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2023.


Alsop T . Virtual reality (VR) - statistics & facts . 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/topics/2532/virtual-reality-vr/ [Accessed 6 February 2023 ].


Bestsennyy O, Gilbert G, Harris A, Rost J , Telehealth: a quarter-trillion-dollar post-COVID-19 reality? 2020. Available from: McKinsey.com.


Abbadessa G, Brigo F, Clerico M, De Mercanti S, Trojsi F, Tedeschi G, Bonavita S, Lavorgna L . Digital therapeutics in neurology. Journal of Neurology. 2022;269(3):12091224.


van der Kruk SR, Zielinski R, MacDougall H, Hughes-Barton D, Gunn KM . Virtual reality as a patient education tool in healthcare: a scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2022.


Logeswaran A, Munsch C, Chong YJ, Ralph N, McCrossnan J . The role of extended reality technology in healthcare education: Towards a learner-centered approach. Future Healthcare Journal. 2021;8(1):e79.


Soundararajan K, Sivakumar K, Blackmore A, Flynn M . Novel do-it-yourself low-cost abdominal laparoscopy entry simulator for gynaecology trainees. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2022;1(2):1925.


Williams J, Greig P, Anandanadesan R, Bloomfield S, Varun S . Central line training models: limitations and modifications. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2022;2(null):A27.


Quayle A, Harrison N, Gaunt K, McGuffie R . 33 Infant abduction: live simulation drills explore the risk in the maternity unit. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2021;1(null):A30.


Burns ML. Medical trauma assessment through the use of smart textiles. Billerica, MA: Science Math And Engineering Inc. 1995.


Buléon C, Caton J, Park YS, Eller S, Buyck M, Kardong-Edgren S, et al. The state of distance healthcare simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of an international survey. Advances in Simulation. 2022;7(1):10.


Dicuonzo G, Donofrio F, Fusco A, Shini M . Healthcare system: moving forward with artificial intelligence. Technovation. 2023;120:102510.


Chatgpt [Internet] . ChatGPT online: AI advanced chatbot by OpenAI . [cited 2023 Feb 8]. Available from: https://chatgptonline.net/.


Amin SU, Hossain MS . Edge intelligence and internet of things in healthcare: a survey. IEEE Access. 2020;9:4559.


Naidu T . Southern exposure: levelling the Northern tilt in global medical and medical humanities education. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2021;26(2):739752.


Ahmed RA, Misra A . The inaugural Short Reports on Simulation Innovations Supplement (SRSIS): Creative solutions to real-world problems. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. 2022;1(null):S1S2.


Hallmark B, Brown M, Peterson DT, Fey M, Decker S, Wells-Beede E, et al. Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM professional development. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021;58:58.


Bajwa M, Ahmed R, Lababidi H, Morris M, Morton A, Mosher C, et al. Development of distance simulation educator guidelines in healthcare: a Delphi method application. Simulation in Healthcare. 2023:1097. Doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000707


Nickson CP, Petrosoniak A, Barwick S, Brazil V . Translational simulation: from description to action. Advances in Simulation. 2021;6:11.


Franklin AE, Dodd C, Sideras S, Hutson J . A toolbox to make multisite simulation research successful. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2018;21:1622.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated).