Home Volume: 3, Issue: Supplement 1
International Journal of Healthcare Simulation
image
A107Mental Health Simulation for Foundation Doctors: Bridging the gap of placement variation

DOI:10.54531/IXGD1670, Volume: 3, Issue: Supplement 1, Pages: A74-A74
Article Type: In Practice, Article History

Table of Contents

Highlights

Notes

Abstract

Background and aim:

There is significant variation of foundation programme tracks across the United Kingdom, giving a range of clinical exposure to newly qualified doctors [1]. Common themes in tracks can be identified to include acute/emergency, community, general medicine, surgery and psychiatry components. In the deanery, many Foundation Trainees (FTs) on psychiatry will have up to 3 additional simulation days devoted to psychiatry themes and this is felt to be an especially effective way to supplement education on psychiatry consultation skills [2]. FTs who do not have psychiatry posts will not have the opportunity to attend this training. Typically, mandatory foundation simulation training focuses on human factors related to acute medical and surgical problems [3]. Our education department has developed a pilot programme to support simulation training on key mental health consultations to support well rounded training of FTs.

Activity:

Half day sessions have been delivered to small groups of FTs who do not have psychiatry posts. Faculty has included experienced simulation faculty and psychiatry doctors and the scenarios conducted in a small group format with professional actors playing patients for increased realism of scenarios. The participants rotated between 3 key scenarios covering essential themes of mental state examination, psychiatry team liaison, patient risk assessment and explaining mental health presentations.

Findings:

2 sessions have been delivered for a total of 18 FTs. FTs showed insight to a number of challenges related to mental health presentations they had experienced outside of psychiatric settings and this formed the outline of the learning objectives for the session. The participants further reflected on discussions in their feedback from the session and portfolio. The sessions were well received, with improvement in confidence in managing these consultations demonstrated in pre and post course survey comparison from the majority of participants. Given the initial success of the session, the team is building a database of local faculty for continuity of the course and looking to secure relevant funding from HEE to provide further sessions for the FTs in the next academic year.

Conclusion:

This simulation pilot has shown promise to be a useful addition to supplement the education of FTs for mental health consultations applicable in all areas of their clinical practice.

Ethics statement:

Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

Stevens and Sterling: A107Mental Health Simulation for Foundation Doctors: Bridging the gap of placement variation

References

1. UKFPO, UKFP Programmes, Available from: https://foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/programmes/2-year-foundation-programme/ukfp/, [27/04/2023]

2. Piot MA, Attoe C, Billon G, Cross S, Rethans JJ, Falissard B. Simulation Training in Psychiatry for Medical Education: A Review. Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 21;12:658967.

3. UKFPO, UK Foundation Programme Curriculum 2021, Available from: https://foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/curriculum/, [27/04/2023]