International Journal of Healthcare Simulation

Background and aim:

Research suggests that interprofessional training wards (ITW) enhance student learning and patient satisfaction [1] but are resource intensive from governance and faculty training points of view. Given NHS pressures, we developed a simulated ITW to meet training needs of healthcare undergraduates and improve attitudes and confidence regarding interprofessional working prior to qualification.

Methods:

The session simulated a typical ward day, with nursing handover, ward-round, board-round, communication scenarios, and an acutely deteriorating patient. Final year medical, nursing and physiotherapy students attended, and formed interprofessional teams. After each scenario an interprofessional debrief took place. Students completed the readiness for interprofessional learning scale (RIPLS) [2] pre and post, also providing feedback using Likert scales and qualitative comments.

Results:

35 students participated, all completing RIPLS, and 32 completing Likert and qualitative feedback. Despite the small dataset, we demonstrated significant change (p<0.05) in 9 of the RIPLS statements, indicating a positive change in attitudes toward interprofessional learning.

All students felt the session met their learning requirements. Likert feedback across professions demonstrated increased understanding and valuing of multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) (97%); appreciation of the relevance of multi-disciplinary working to their training (91%); belief that it would change their approach to MDT work (84%); and increased confidence prior to transitioning to a working role (81%). Profession-specific breakdown demonstrated highest confidence and increased understanding for physiotherapists, however they (alongside nurses) found the content more challenging.

Figure 1-A35:

Summary of infographic for SUIT ward

Thematic analysis highlighted several key themes: Interprofessional teamworking, patient-centred care, communication, professional readiness, technical skills, and satisfaction with session format and delivery. Interprofessional teamworking, patient-centred care, and communication bridged the categories of ‘valued aspects’ and ‘take-home messages’, demonstrating uptake of key learning points, and reinforcing the changes in the RIPLS data. While the feedback regarding the ‘suggested improvements’ category reiterated the challenges of catering to all learners, this category’s comments were overwhelmingly positive, with appreciation and importance of this learning event appearing frequently. One wrote, ‘I feel incredibly lucky to have had the opportunity to take part… and strongly believe every single healthcare student should have the chance to attend a similar session’.

Conclusion:

Our pilot program suggests that using simulated ITWs offers multiple benefits to students. The simulated ITW environment improved confidence and understanding of interprofessional roles in clinical practice; and was valuable and relevant to learners with early signs of improving attitudes towards interprofessional learning. A full study is needed to fully assess the learning benefits and cost-effectiveness of simulated ITW environments.

Ethics statement:

Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.