<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="In Practice" dtd-version="1.3d1" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ijohs</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>International Journal of Healthcare Simulation</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>International Journal of Healthcare Simulation</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2754-4524</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Adi Health + Wellness</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>London, UK</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WZQJ2908.105</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54531/WZQJ2908</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading"><subject>In Practice</subject></subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="section"><subject>Technology</subject></subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>A104<break/>A virtual musculoskeletal case history simulation with service users for pre-registration physiotherapy students</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>McNally</surname><given-names>Carol</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"><name><surname>Baines</surname><given-names>Katy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Oxford Brookes University</institution>, Oxford, <country>United Kingdom</country></aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1"><bold>Correspondence:</bold> <email xlink:href="camcnally@brookes.ac.uk">camcnally@brookes.ac.uk</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2023-10-31"><day>31</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<supplement>1</supplement>
<fpage>A71</fpage>
<lpage>A72</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; The Author(s). 2023</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:title="pdf" xlink:href="WZQJ2908.105.pdf"/>
<abstract>
<sec><title>Background and aim:</title>
<p>Within health care provision many case history assessments are now performed online [1], with students expected to utilize a variety of virtual platforms in a safe, effective and professional manner.</p>
<p>Aim: To approximate a real environment for students to practice virtual skills of case history assessment with service users.</p>
<p>Objectives: Student development of: 1. Virtual communication skills (verbal, non-verbal, active listening, respect), 2. Clinical reasoning and interpretation, and 3. Reflective skills facilitated by debrief.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Activity:</title>
<p>Simulation preparation including revision of musculoskeletal assessment and familiarization with virtual ground rules linked to HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics [2].</p>
<p>42 students participated, split into groups of 14 for each virtual simulation session with a total of 5 service users briefed beforehand. Initial warm-up activities in breakout rooms were used to familiarize students with use of the online platform and to facilitate virtual communication skills. Groups of 4 students planned and undertook a virtual musculoskeletal case history with a service user.</p>
<p>The Diamond structure for simulation debrief [3] was facilitated by Faculty staff involving the service users and peers; enabling further development of the students&#x2019; clinical reasoning and interpretation. Students reflected on their own performance using a simulation checklist as a resource, closing the loop by creating an action plan prior to their first practice placement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Findings:</title>
<p>25 students voluntarily completed an anonymous questionnaire linked to their virtual experiential learning activity. 75% strongly agreed and 21% agreed that the simulation was helpful in their development for placements (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F24">Figure 1-A122</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F24" position="float"><label>Figure 1-A104:</label><caption><p>Graph to show student response that virtual musculoskeletal simulation with service users was helpful in their development for placements</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="WZQJ2908_f024.jpg"/></fig>
<p>Thematic analysis of good aspects of the activity identified 4 main themes:
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><label>1.</label><p>Benefits and realism of service user involvement compared to actors or peers</p></list-item>
<list-item><label>2.</label><p>Development of virtual communication and assessment skills</p></list-item>
<list-item><label>3.</label><p>Richness of involvement of service users in the debrief</p></list-item>
<list-item><label>4.</label><p>Usefulness of warm up activities using virtual technology</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>Suggestions for improvement showed 2 main themes around increasing planning time and more opportunities for simulation with service users.</p>
<p>Findings demonstrated the simulation aims and objectives were met with students positively reporting that the activity was helpful in their learning ahead of practice placements - enabling development of virtual communication, clinical reasoning/ interpretation and reflection through debrief.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion:</title>
<p>Approximation of a real environment for students to practice virtual case history assessment incorporating service users offers a rich educational example that aligns well with practice and sustainability in the current healthcare environment and is highly valued by students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Ethics statement:</title>
<p>Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<conference>
<conf-date iso-8601-date="2023">2023</conf-date>
<conf-name>ASPiH conference abstracts for IJoHS supplement 2023</conf-name>
</conference>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta><meta-name>version</meta-name><meta-value>fulltext</meta-value></custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<back>
<sec><title>References</title>
<p>1. Mold F, Cooke D, Ip A, Roy P, Denton S, Armes J. COVID-19 and beyond: virtual consultations in primary care&#x2014;reflecting on the evidence base for implementation and ensuring reach: commentary article. BMJ Health &#x0026; Care Informatics [Internet]. 2021 Jan;28(1):e100256. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://informatics.bmj.com/content/28/1/e100256">https://informatics.bmj.com/content/28/1/e100256</ext-link></p>
<p>2. HCPC. Information for students and education providers [Internet]. 2016. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.hcpc-uk.org/globalassets/resources/guidance/guidance-on-conduct-and-ethics-for-students.pdf?v=637106442980000000">https://www.hcpc-uk.org/globalassets/resources/guidance/guidance-on-conduct-and-ethics-for-students.pdf?v=637106442980000000</ext-link></p>
<p>3. Jaye P, Thomas L, Reedy G. &#x201C;The Diamond&#x201D;: a structure for simulation debrief. The Clinical Teacher [Internet]. 2015 May 25;12(3):171&#x2013;5. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497353/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497353/</ext-link></p>
</sec>
</back>
</article>